POS & Emotional Dissonance as resource depletion mechanisms in Workplace Bullying and Job Strains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines the emotional and support resource depletion mechanisms through which workplace bullying as a stressor manifests into Burnout and Psychological strain. Using the Conservation of resources (COR) theory, we hypothesize that workplace bullying erodes victim's perceived organizational support and emotional dissonance which further exhausts their resources (job burnout and psychological strain). We collected temporally separated (3 time intervals 3 months apart) field data from employees working in the service sector to test or hypothesis. Our results revealed that Workplace bullying at T1 predicted Perceived organization support and Emotional dissonance at T2 and Job Strains (Burnout and Psychological Strain) at T3. Moreover, cross lagged relationships identified that Perceptions of Organization Support (T2) and Emotional Dissonance (T2) fully mediated the workplace bullying (T1) and job strains (T3) relationship. Our study adds important insights into the causal mechanisms of workplace bullying by identifying and examining two unique processes through which workplace bullying shows its deleterious effects on its victims.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".