Le débat sur la mondialisation culturelle à l’heure du « numérique » : le cas de Netflix au Canada.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resume : Durant le XXe siecle, l’explosion des medias de masse et l’affirmation de quelques conglomerats transnationaux soulevent l’inquietude de certain Etats quant au maintien de leur souverainete culturelle. Des lors, le terme controverse de diversite culturelle va mobiliser une large part des discussions internationales tandis qu’on s’interroge sur les effets de la mondialisation culturelle. Aujourd’hui, c’est l’affirmation hegemonique de quelques acteurs issus du numerique qui, faisant peu de cas des frontieres des Etats, renouvelle ces debats. Dans le present article, nous avons souhaite revenir sur le developpement de Netflix au Canada. En quelques annees, la societe de Los Gatos a connu une croissance exponentielle dans le pays tout en echappant aux obligations de la loi sur la radiodiffusion, en questionnant la place des acteurs historiques de l’audiovisuel et en se preoccupant peu de la mise en valeur de la production culturelle locale/regionale. En nous appuyant sur les travaux traitant de la mondialisation culturelle, nous avons choisi de discuter ici des enjeux socio-economiques et culturels du developpement du service de video en ligne americain au Canada. Abstract : During the 20th century, the rise of mass media and the affirmation of some transnational conglomerates concerned countries in regards to their cultural sovereignty. Therefore, the controversial term of cultural diversity took a large part of the international discussions, while debating the effects of cultural globalization. Today, this debate is renewed by some new hegemonic digital actors which don't care about frontiers. In the present article, we revisited the development of Netflix Canada. In the last past years, the company Los Gatos has known an exponential growth in Canada without being concerned about any regulations on broadcasting. This questions the place of historical audiovisual actors and undermining local and regional cultural production. Based on works on cultural globalization, we developed the socioeconomic and cultural challenges of the development online video services in the USA and Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".