MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 166: Chasing the 90-Minute Target for First Medical Contact to Balloon (FMC2B) Time in EMS-Transported STEMI Patients at Two Teaching Hospitals

2013· article· en· W2670858295 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Abhinav Goyal, Leslie Stigaard, Muna Jeter, Mary Casey, Sharon Vanairsdale, Jane M. Wilson, S. Tanveer Rab, Matthew Keadey, Anwar Osborne, Douglas C. Morris, James Capes, Henry Liberman, Michael A. Ross

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMedical emergencyPsychological interventionEmergency medicineQuarter (Canadian coin)Emergency medical servicesNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: AHA Guidelines establish a 90-minute target for First Medical Contact to Balloon (FMC2B) time in STEMI patients transported by emergency medical services (EMS) to STEMI-receiving centers. We describe the measures implemented and progress to date in achieving this new standard of care in two STEMI-receiving hospitals within one health system. Quality Improvement Goal and Data Sources: In Quarter 3 (Q3) 2011, our hospitals began participating in the AHA Mission: Lifeline program to build regional STEMI systems of care. We established a goal for each hospital to achieve the 90-minute FMC2B target in 75% or more of EMS-transported STEMI patients within at least one quarter in 2012. We used our AHA Mission: Lifeline reports (derived from our submitted ACTION-Registry GWTG data) to track our FMC2B times quarterly across five quarters (Q3 2011 through Q3 2012), and internal hospital data to determine the relationship between pre-hospital cath lab activation and achieving FMC2B targets. Interventions and Results: There were 36 and 43 STEMI patients respectively at each hospital who were eligible for FMC2B reporting over five quarters. Rates of achieving the 90-minute FMC2B target are shown before, during, and after implementation of seven hospital-wide interventions (Figure). Success rates were initially variable but improved in the last three quarters at both hospitals. One hospital reached the 75% consistency threshold for achieving the FMC2B target in Q1 2012, and both hospitals achieved a ≥70% success rate in the final reported quarter (Q3 2012). In both hospitals combined, 71.4% of patients with pre-hospital cath lab activation achieved the 90-minute FMC2B target, compared with only 50.0% when the cath lab was activated after hospital arrival (p=0.033). Equipment breakdown during attempted transmission of the pre-hospital ECG was a common reason for failure to activate the cath lab from the field. Conclusions and Next Steps: Consistent achievement of the 90-minute FMC2B target in STEMI patients requires unprecedented team-building and trust between EMS, ED, and cardiology personnel. A particular focus in 2013 will be increasing the rate of pre-hospital cath lab activations through EMS-to-ED phone calls when EMS is unable to transmit the field ECG to our hospitals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and OutcomesSame topicCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationFrench-language works237,207