MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

609 Development of New Heat Supply Unit Using Latent Heat Storage

2004· article· en· W2670969182 on OpenAlexaff
Terushige Fujii, Hitoshi Asano, Kazuaki Nogami, Yoshinori Hisazumi, Tetsuo Abiko, Toshihiro Hori

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Proceedings of Conference of Kansai Branch · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicEnergy, Environment, Agriculture Analysis
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermal energy storagePhase-change materialMaterials scienceCopper in heat exchangersHeat exchangerParaffin waxHeat transferHeat spreaderPlate fin heat exchangerThermodynamicsLatent heatThermal conductivityNuclear engineeringPlate heat exchangerComposite materialThermalWaxEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The high efficient co-generation system named "Neighboring Communities Co-generation System" is proposed to a multiple dwelling house. The key technology of this system is to connect home and home with one loop of heat transfer line of one inch diameter, and to level the heat demand by a heat storage unit in each house. This system require compact and high response heat storage unit. In this study, a plate fin type brazing heat exchanger was applied and tested for a heat storage unit. Sodium acetate trihydrate with a melting point of about 58 ^ΩC and paraffin wax with a higher value of 74.8 ^ΩC were used as the phase change material (PCM). As a result, it was shown that the heat transfer in the heat storage unit was dominated by thermal conductivity in PCM. Paraffin wax made higher responsibility and higher heat output due its higher melting point and quite small super cooling in solidification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Proceedings of Conference of Kansai BranchSame topicEnergy, Environment, Agriculture AnalysisFrench-language works237,207