MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ICONE23-1730 STUDY ON SPECIFICS OF THERMOPHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS IN POWER ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS

2015· article· en· W2671558553 on OpenAlexaff
David Mann, Igor Pioro

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat transfer and supercritical fluids
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectricity generationNuclear powerThermal power stationEnvironmental scienceSupercritical fluidCoolantNuclear engineeringCoalWaste managementElectricityProcess engineeringPower stationEngineeringPower (physics)Mechanical engineeringChemistryNuclear physicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SuperCritical Pressures (SCPs) and SuperCritical Fluids (SFCs) are widely used in many industries worldwide. The largest application of SCPs is in the power industry in advanced coal-fired power plants. It is well-known that moving from subcritical-pressure power plants to SCP power plants increases gross thermal efficiency from 38-42% to about 50-55%. Despite all advances in thermal power-plants design and operation worldwide, they are still considered as not "environmentally friendly" due to significant carbon-dioxide emissions and air pollution as a result of the combustion process. In addition, coal-fired power-plants also produce virtual mountains of slag and ash, and other gas emissions that may contribute to acid rains. Therefore, the demand for clean, non-fossil-based electricity is growing. Due to this, nuclear power is considered as a basis for future electricity generation in the world. One of the major problems with current fleet of Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) is their relatively low thermal efficiencies, especially, of water-cooled-reactor NPPs (the vast majority of NPPs) (30-36%), compared to those of advanced thermal power plants (55-62%). Based on that, next generation or Generation-IV reactors corresponding to those NPPs should definitely be more efficient. Higher level of thermal efficiencies can be reached only due to higher temperatures and, in some cases, higher pressures inside reactors and, especially, in power cycles of Generation-IV NPPs. Analysis of the six concepts of Generation-IV reactors and NPPs shows that three reactor concepts will use SCFs as reactor coolants (helium and water) and all concepts can be linked to SCFs as working fluids in power cycles (SC helium and /or carbon dioxide in the Brayton gas-turbine cycle, and SC water in the Rankine steam-turbine cycle). Therefore, the exact knowledge of specifics of thermophysical properties of SC helium, water and carbon dioxide is very important for any advances in these new nuclear-power technologies. Also, scientists, researchers and engineers should use the same terms describing reactor coolants and power-cycle working fluids at various subcritical and SCPs. Based on that, the objective of the current paper is to define all possible terms to be used at SCPs and to link them with the appropriate regions in the Pressure-Temperature and Temperature-Specific Entropy diagrams.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.291
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE)Same topicHeat transfer and supercritical fluidsFrench-language works237,207