MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2672617087 · doi:10.1149/ma2017-02/4/232

HQ - US Army Development of High Voltage Olivine Cathode

2017· article· en· W2672617087 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jan L. Allen, Samuel A. Delp, J. Wolfenstine, T. Richard Jow, Dong Liu, Chi-Su Kim, Myunghun Cho, Abdelbast Guerfi, Karim Zaghib

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCathodeOlivineMaterials scienceElectrolyteLithium (medication)Chemical engineeringMineralogyChemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The need for environmentally friendly, safe, stable, and low cost materials for application in lithium-ion batteries has led to strong interest in developing olivine-type LiMPO4 (M = Fe, Mn, Co, Ni) cathode materials. Among them, LiFePO4 (LFP) has been extensively studied and commercialized. However, LFP has some special shortcomings in practical applications, such as low potential plateau (3.4 V vs. Li/Li+) and small packing density (due to the inclusion of large-volume carbon), which lead to relatively low specific energy density (580 Wh kg-1). Whereas LiCoPO4 (LCP) in the olivine family has been considered as an attractive cathode candidate due to the large theoretical capacity (167 mAh g-1), high operating voltage (4.8 V vs. Li/Li+) and high specific energy density (800 Wh kg-1). However, LCP suffers from severe capacity fade due to the low intrinsic electronic/ionic conductivity, structure deterioration and electrolyte decomposition [1]. In this work, Hydro Quebec and US Army Research Laboratory dedicated to develop the high voltage olivine cathode. Specifically, partially Co-substitution strategy with a carbon coating was successfully used to improve the cycling stability of LCP cathode [2]. FIG. 1 shows the cyclability of substituted-LCP olivine cathode at room temperature under C/3 rate, from which no obvious capacity loss was observed in 100 cycles. Moreover, phosphate based cathodes may provide higher abuse tolerance than oxides at a given voltage due the strong covalent band of P-O. Therefore, the substituted high voltage LCP olivine cathode has the apparent potential to be a next decade success story in lithium-ion technologies and to find large application in the next generation lithium-ion batteries. References [1] K. Tadanaga, F. Mizuno, A. Hayashi, T. Minami, M. Tatsumisago, Electrochemistry 71, 1192 (2003). [2] J. L. Allen, J. L. Allen, T. Thompson, S. A. Delp, J. Wolfenstine, T. Richard Jow, J. Power Sources, 327, 229 (2016). Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studiesFrench-language works237,207