MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W267675853

Rob Appleford, Ed.: Aboriginal Drama and Theatre

2012· article· en· W267675853 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
W. B. Worthen

Bibliographic record

VenueTheatre Research in Canada · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDramaTempestArt historyPoliticsArtSociologyHistoryMedia studiesLiteratureLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ROB APPLEFORD, ed. Aboriginal Drama and Critical Perspectives on in English.Vol. 1. Toronto: Playwrights Canada, 2005. 187pp. ALAN FILEWOD, ed. Histories Critical Perspectives on in English. Vol. 13. Toronto: Playwrights Canada, 2009. 226pp. SUSAN KNUTSON, ed. Shakespeare Critical Perspectives on in English. Vol. 18.Toronto: Playwrights Canada, 2010. 214pp. It's a measure of the critical and political orientation of the superb Critical Perspectives on in English series that the first volume is devoted to Aboriginal Drama and Theatre. In its title, of course, the volume lays claim to a specific sense of the field: whatever Canadian Theatre will emerge from the series, it will begin by embracing Aboriginal drama and theatre--a set of vexed terms in themselves--as constitutive. General editor Ric Knowles animates the teaching of drama and in schools and universities with this initial gesture, and whether it's Lewis Baumander's 1987 and 1989 productions of The Tempest, set on the Queen Charlotte Islands in the late eighteenth century and featuring two First Nations actors--Monique Mojica and Billy Merasty--as Ariel and Caliban, or the repeated engagements with the of Mojica, Tomson Highway, and other writers and performers, the Canadian theatre that emerges from this series maps its diversity from this point of departure. What do these three volumes have in common and how do they sketch the ambition of the series: to bring together the most important critical work (Aboriginal Drama and iii)--a mix of previously-published and newly-commissioned pieces--in the field, to open a perspective on the emergence of the formal discipline of Studies, and to fill in gaps in representation and correct historical injustices and imbalances, particularly those concerning marginalized communities (Canadian Shakespeare iii). In the Histories volume, Alan Filewod has been guided by a set of thematic concerns operating across the articles: an urgent commitment to feminist analysis (Susan Bennett's Feminist (Theatre) Historiography/Canadian (Feminist) Theatre), to the interplay between local and national identity formations (Ric Knowles's account of Mulgrave Road), and to the interface--marked in Denis Salter's landmark essay On Native Ground: Historiography and the Postmodernism/Post-colonialism Axis--between historiography and the competing paradigms of postcolonial and postmodern analysis, two terms of the art coeval with the configuration of Studies itself. These motifs are traced in other volumes, too, whether it's the localism of the classroom in Tony Dawson's essay on university actors meeting the universal bard in Susan Knutson's Shakespeare, on the ways in which nationalism is both reproduced and interrogated in specific Shakespeare productions and by the institutional function of festivals like Stratford, or indeed, in one of the central essays of Aboriginal Drama and Theatre, Knowles's self-conscious engagement of the productive friction between Aboriginal performance and an emerging academic discipline: is there a sense of the cultural work that this performance might perform in shifting power relationships within contemporary and 'American' (in its broadest senses) societies (107). Beyond charting a wary encounter with / / Studies, each of these volumes evinces a different grasp of the interplay between specific writers, companies, and productions and the development of framing analytical paradigms. Aboriginal Drama and opens, for instance, with Tomson Highway's 1987 On Native Mythology, an intense and personal effort to locate the task of the playwright in relation to the desire of we Indian people to defend its dreamlife, its particular landscape, and to share that something terribly relevant and beautiful with general audiences (3). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0680.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheatre Research in CanadaSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207