MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2679333672 · doi:10.1038/micronano.2015.14

A paper-based microfluidic biosensor integrating zinc oxide nanowires for electrochemical glucose detection

2015· article· en· W2679333672 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrosystems & Nanoengineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiosensors and Analytical Detection
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsGlucose oxidaseMaterials scienceBiosensorNanowireNanotechnologyMicrofluidicsDetection limitElectrodeSubstrate (aquarium)ElectrochemistryZincOptoelectronicsChemistryChromatographyMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper reports an electrochemical microfluidic paper-based analytical device (EμPAD) for glucose detection, featuring a highly sensitive working electrode (WE) decorated with zinc oxide nanowires (ZnO NWs). In addition to the common features of μPADs, such as their low costs, high portability/disposability, and ease of operation, the reported EμPAD has three further advantages. (i) It provides higher sensitivity and a lower limit of detection (LOD) than previously reported μPADs because of the high surface-to-volume ratio and high enzyme-capturing efficiency of the ZnO NWs. (ii) It does not need any light-sensitive electron mediator (as is usually required in enzymatic glucose sensing), which leads to enhanced biosensing stability. (iii) The ZnO NWs are directly synthesized on the paper substrate via low-temperature hydrothermal growth, representing a simple, low-cost, consistent, and mass-producible process. To achieve superior analytical performance, the on-chip stored enzyme (glucose oxidase) dose and the assay incubation time are tuned. More importantly, the critical design parameters of the EμPAD, including the WE area and the ZnO-NW growth level, are adjusted to yield tunable ranges for the assay sensitivity and LOD. The highest sensitivity that we have achieved is 8.24 μA·mM −1 ·cm −2 , with a corresponding LOD of 59.5 μM. By choosing the right combination of design parameters, we constructed EμPADs that cover the range of clinically relevant glucose concentrations (0−15 mM) and fully calibrated these devices using spiked phosphate-buffered saline and human serum. We believe that the reported approach for integrating ZnO NWs on EμPADs could be well utilized in many other designs of EμPADs and provides a facile and inexpensive paradigm for further enhancing the device performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it