Fluorescent organic cations for human OCT2 transporters screening: uptake in CHO cells stably expressing hOCT2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p class="ADMETabstracttext">The aim of this study was to assess the suitability of amiloride, rhodamine 6G and rhodamine 123 as non-radioactive substrates for characterizing hOCT2 using CHO cells. The uptake characteristics of these compounds were compared in wild-type (WT) and human organic cation transporter 2 (hOCT2)-stably transfected Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells. All the compounds were accumulated by the CHO-hOCT2 cells. Intracellular uptake of the compounds was higher in CHO cells stably-expressing hOCT2 compared to the WT. The uptake was concentration–dependent and saturable (except for rhodamine 123). The affinities of the compounds for the hOCT2 (in descending order) were: amiloride (K<sub>m</sub> = 72.63 ± 12.02 µM) &gt; rhodamine 6 G (K<sub>m</sub> = 82.47 ± 29.15 µM). Uptake of amiloride in transfected cells was pH -dependent and significantly inhibited by hOCT2 inhibitors (quinine, verapamil and quinidine). Based on our kinetic data and other considerations, we recommend the use of amiloride for characterizing hOCT2 transporters.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".