Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le droit des etrangers est loin de satisfaire aux exigences de clarte, d’accessibilite et, partant, de securite juridique si l’on se refere a l’eclatement de ses sources ecrites. A cote des normes traitant incontestablement, de par leur objet, de l’entree et de sejour des etrangers, d’autres s’adressent, de prime abord, a toute personne residant en France, sans condition de nationalite. Pourtant notamment dans le domaine du travail et des prestations sociales, un examen plus approfondi de ces textes revele que leur application est subordonnee a une contrainte specifique de residence et surtout de regularite, renvoyant par la meme a l’exigence d’un titre de sejour. En effet une nouvelle forme de migration est nee : les femmes sont devenues des actrices incontournables dans le processus migratoire. Dans cette these, l’accent est mis sur l’exemple de la femme senegalaise. Par ailleurs, en multipliant les reformes, legislateur et gouvernement n’ont pas procede a la refonte de l’ordonnance N° 45-2658 du 2 novembre 1945, qui progressivement, a perdu son unite originelle et une certaine vocation codificatrice. Certains articles, profondement demembres, sont aujourd’hui difficilement lisibles (notamment art 35 bis, ter, et quater). Cette these d’inspiration doctrinale et jurisprudentielle, doit etre comprise comme le recensement des normes de droit constitutionnelles, communautaires, conventionnelles, penales, civiles, administratives, legislatives, et reglementaires se rapportant a l’entree et au sejour des etrangers en France, au depart force du territoire,a l’acces a la nationalite francaise et a l’asile politique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.322 | 0.173 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".