MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ICONE23-1747 HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS OF AN INTERMEDIATE HEAT EXCHANGER FOR AN SCWR HYDROGEN COGENERATION PLANT

2015· article· en· W2692239437 on OpenAlexaff
Juan Carlos Jouvin, Igor Pioro

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat transfer and supercritical fluids
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCogenerationSupercritical fluidHeat exchangerHydrogen productionNuclear engineeringCoolantHeat transferWorking fluidRankine cycleHydrogenMaterials scienceChemistryThermodynamicsElectricity generationEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The SuperCritical Water-cooled Reactor (SCWR) concept is one of six Generation-IV nuclear-reactor systems currently under development worldwide. One of the benefits of such a reactor is the increase in thermal efficiency due to the reactor coolant operating above the critical point of water (22.064 MPa and 373.95℃). Pressure-Tube (PT) SCWRs are being designed to work at pressures of 25 MPa with reactor outlet temperatures up to 625℃. These operating conditions make them a suitable candidate for thermochemical hydrogen cogeneration. This work investigates the use of SCWR process heat for the thermochemical production of hydrogen. A thermochemical cycle currently being studied for this purpose is the 4-stage Copper-Chlorine (Cu-Cl) cycle, due to its relatively low temperature requirements when compared to other existing thermochemical cycles. To achieve this, an intermediate Heat eXchanger (HX) linking an SCWR Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) and a hydrogen production facility is considered. The objective of this work is to complete a heat-transfer analysis on an intermediate counter-flow double-pipe HX to be used for the cogeneration of hydrogen. The HX is located downstream of an SCWR using the reactor coolant, SuperCritical Water (SCW), through the inner tube and a separate supercritical working fluid in the outer tube. In this work the thermal energy requirements for the 4-stage Cu-Cl cycle are identified. A numerical model is developed in MATLAB and a sensitivity analysis is conducted. The sensitivity analysis determines the effect that various parameters, such as pressure, mass flux, percentage of power diverted and pipe thickness will have on the overall system. Based on the results obtained from the numerical model, the design of the counter-flow double-pipe HX can be optimized to improve its efficiency. Ultimately, this will give an indication to a size of the HX depending on input parameters that are selected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE)Same topicHeat transfer and supercritical fluidsFrench-language works237,207