Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fluorinated compounds (such as CFC, HCFC, HFC, PFC and SF_6) had been used widely because of excellent features and safety for human health. However, once they are discharged into the atmosphere, they cause destruction of ozone layer and greenhouse effect of the earth, which led to restrictions in the production and use of fluorinated compounds discussed internationally in Vienna (1985), Montreal (1987), and Kyoto (1997). In Japan, fluorocarbons recovery and destruction law was enacted, and appropriate procedures for its destruction are also stipulated in the law. TSKE (Tsukishima Kankyo Engineering Ltd.) has developed a highly efficient fluorinated compounds destruction system based on the technologies accumulated over many years of experience in the destruction of chlorinated organic compounds. The first plant was constructed for destruction of by-product of fluorinated organic material production unit in 1992, before the Third Conference of Parties (COP3) agreement in Kyoto. Up to now, 13 plants in Japan and 5 plants overseas have been constructed. In 2004, this technology was awarded the "Chairman prize of the Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers", and also was awarded the "Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry" prize in 2005.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".