MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2693595243 · doi:10.5840/humanitas2016291/26

Schooling for "Deep-Knowing": On the Education of a Pithecanthropus Erectus

2016· article· en· W2693595243 on OpenAlexaff
Sean Steel

Bibliographic record

VenueHumanitas · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHymnLiteratureTragedy (event)PoetryPoeticsArtContext (archaeology)FablePhilosophyClassicsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We busted out of class, had to get away from those fools.We learned more from a three-minute record, baby, than we ever learned in school.Tonight 1 hear the neighbourhood drummer sound, I can feel my heart begin to pound.You say you're tired and you just want to close your eyes.And follow your dreams down.-from ''No Surrender" (Born in the USA) Bruce SpringsteenTwenty-five hundred years ago, Plato commented that the downfall of a city {polls) would result from the corruption of its tragedies.Tragedy, originally a "goat song" {tragodia) or sacred hymn performed at the festivals of Dionysus, god of wine and ecstasy, was the highest form of art in the ancient world.In tragedy, the poet {poietes) or "maker" was the teacher of grown-up men in the same way that the schoolteacher {didaskalos) was with regard to boys.Here, the case of the ancient, tragic poet-teacher is instructive in our modern context, for where a modern-day schoolteacher might be said to be an historian {historikos), or one concerned with understanding "the real facts" of the world and of human society, in his Poet- SEAN STEEL is Sessional Instructor in the Faculty of Education at the University of Calgary. Schooling for "Deep-Knowing"HUMANITAS • 133

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0120.008
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumanitasSame topicHermeneutics and Narrative IdentityFrench-language works237,207