MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficacy, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of EPI-506 (ralaniten acetate), a novel androgen receptor (AR) N-terminal domain (NTD) inhibitor, in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progressing after enzalutamide and/or abiraterone.

2017· article· en· W2694871785 on OpenAlexaff
Kim N., Ulka N. Vaishampayan, Michael S. Gordon, David C. Smith, Erin Rudsinski, Angela De Haas-Amatsaleh, Neil Thapar, Frank Perabo, Bruce Montgomery

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTolerabilityEnzalutamidePharmacokineticsProstate cancerAdverse effectInternal medicineAbiraterone acetateGastroenterologyNauseaPharmacologyDosingAndrogen receptorOncologyUrologyCancerAndrogen deprivation therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5032 Background: EPI-506 (ralaniten acetate) is a first-in-class small molecule transcription inhibitor of the AR NTD. Nonclinical studies demonstrated activity against both full length and resistance-related AR species, including AR-v7. Methods: Open-label, single-arm, Phase 1/2 study evaluating EPI-506 administered orally once-daily. The Phase 1 is a 3+3 design to establish the safety, pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, and recommended phase 2 dose of EPI-506. Anti-tumor activity is also evaluated. Inclusion criteria included: mCRPC with progression after ≥1 line of hormonal therapy or chemotherapy, and progression on enzalutamide and/or abiraterone. Results: Eighteen patients (pts) have been enrolled in the dose escalation phase over 5 dose levels (80, 160, 320, 640, 1280 mg). Median age was 71 (range 58-87). Prior treatments included enzalutamide only (N = 7), abiraterone only (N = 2) or both (N = 9). Six pts have had prior chemotherapy. Seven pts have discontinued due to disease progression and 2 pts due to adverse events (AEs): Grade 4 elevated amylase (related) and Grade 4 gastrointestinal bleeding (unrelated). Median exposure was 98.5 days (range 26-338). Most frequently reported treatment emergent AEs were diarrhea (N = 7), nausea (N = 5) and fatigue (N = 3). One Grade 3 AE (AST elevation) at 1280 mg and one Grade 4 AE (increased amylase) at 640 mg were reported. PK data demonstrate a dose-proportional profile for Cmax and AUC coupled with an initial negative food effect up to 640 mg. At week 4 of continuous dosing, 3 of 18 evaluable pts demonstrated PSA declines ranging from 9 to 18% receiving doses ≥640 mg. Conclusions: EPI-506 is well-tolerated with a favorable safety profile. PK indicates dose-proportionality. PSA declines have been observed at doses associated with sub-therapeutic exposure in preclinical studies. This study is the first to evaluate targeting the AR NTD, a region critical for transcriptional function of all known AR species. Clinical trial information: NCT02606123.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207