MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2695248016 · doi:10.1299/jsmemovic.2011.12.236

D107 Mathematics-Based Modeling and System Simulation for Robot Arm

2011· article· en· W2695248016 on OpenAlexaff
Koichi Shigematsu, Misao Katoh

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Proceedings of the Symposium on the Motion and Vibration Control · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsCybernet Systems Corporation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobotComputer scienceRobotic armSimulationSoftwareSystem dynamicsSet (abstract data type)Arm solutionDomain (mathematical analysis)Control engineeringRobot kinematicsMobile robotEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent increases of the demand of simulation technologies for robot system with multi-body dynamics have attracted various research efforts. To speed up the design and prototyping processes of robot system, a method that automatically generates mathematics equations governing the robot system response in an optimized symbolic form is desirable. To achieve this goal, we employed MapleSim^ , a new physical modeling tool developed by Maplesoft Inc., to develop the multi-domain model of a parallel link robot arm, utilizing the symbolic computing algorithms of Maple software package to generate an optimized set of governing equations. The robot arm model consists of a multi-body arm dynamics, a power electronics and a control model. Simulations are then used to demonstrate the performance of the developed parallel-link robot. Simulation results show that the model is viable and the number of governing equations is reduced significantly, resulting in a computationally efficient system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Proceedings of the Symposium on the Motion and Vibration ControlSame topicRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207