MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2696280440 · doi:10.1109/nssmic.2010.5874451

Calibration of dual-ended readout of axially oriented 100 mm long LYSO crystals for use in a compact PET system

2010· article· en· W2696280440 on OpenAlexaff
Fazal ur-Rehman, Bryan McIntosh, Andrew L. Goertzen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLyso-Collimated lightCrystal (programming language)CalibrationPhysicsPhotomultiplierScintillatorOpticsDetectorIrradiationMaterials scienceNuclear physicsComputer scienceLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are investigating using dual-ended readout of axially-oriented long thin scintillator crystals in detectors for a compact geometry animal PET system. In this work we determine the axial-positioning calibration of a 2 × 2 × 100 mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sup> LYSO crystal wrapped in either Teflon or 3M Enhanced Specular Reflector (ESR) readout at either end by position sensitive photomultiplier tubes (PSPMTs). We compare two methods: the first using a 9-step collimated irradiation method and the second using the method proposed by Shao [Shao et al., Med. Phys. 35(12)5829-5840, 2008], which uses uniform irradiation. In the 9-step irradiation method, an electronically collimated beam of 511 keV photons aimed perpendicular to the long axis of the crystal is used to irradiate the crystal at nine locations in steps of 1 cm. The ratio of the two PMT signals at each irradiation position is used to give the axial-positioning calibration relating ratio signal to position. In the method by Shao, we investigated two variations. In the first, the crystal was irradiated using a uniform Ge-68 line-source at 25 cm and in the second, with a <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">22</sup> Na point source located at 10 cm from the crystal. To check the validity of both the calibration methods for unbalanced detectors, three voltage variations ranging from 750-800 V were used for two PMTs resulting in a higher gain for one detector than the other. LYSO intrinsic activity was also used for the calibration of balanced and unbalanced detectors. It was found in both the methods that the ratio signal for the case of the Teflon wrapped crystal is not linearly dependent with irradiation position, rather following a 3rd order polynomial shape. For the case of ESR the relation was linear. Both the linear and nonlinear axial-positioning functions determined from the nine-step irradiation method show excellent agreement with those determined using Shao's method for a 100 mm long crystal. This method can thus be used to provide a simple axial-positioning calibration with a single measurement both for linear and nonlinear response of 100 mm long crystals. The method will significantly simplify the calibration of these dual-ended readout detectors, especially for the cases of a large number of crystals in a 2D crystal array in a detector. In the case of unbalanced detectors, the calibration is sensitive to gain variation; however, the spatial resolution remains the same (results not shown). The 9-step results reasonably agree with the uniform irradiation of <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">22</sup> Na for central 75% of crystal region. The LYSO intrinsic activity source uniform irradiation results have good agreement with those of <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">22</sup> Na for the three voltage variations. LYSO intrinsic activity can thus be used instead of an external source for the calibration of our proposed complete PET system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207