Spirituality and social work : selected Canadian readings
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Spirituality as a Guiding Construct in the Development of Canadian Social Work: Past and Present Considerations The Haven, 1878-1930: A Toronto Charitys Transition from a Religious to a Professional Social Work Ethos The Social Gospel Excerpts from The Values of Life Moral and Spiritual Values in Social Work Exploring the Spiritual Dimension of Social Work The Helpfulness of Spiritually Influenced Group Work in Developing Self-Awareness and Self-Esteem: A Preliminary Investigation Listening to our Stillness: Giving Voice to Our Spirituality (Spirituality & Clinical Practice) Reframing Spirituality, Reconceptualising Change: Possibilities for Critical Social Work Feminist Community Organising: The Spectre of the Sacred and the Secular Engaging with Spirituality: A Qualitative Study of Grief and HIV/AIDS Circles of Resistance: Spirituality and Transformative Change in Social Work Education and Practice From Ecology to Spirituality and Social Justice Profound Connections between Person and Place: Exploring Location, Spirituality, and Social Work Spirituality, Stress and Work Making Circles: Renewing First Nations Ways of Helping Communities in Co-operation: Human Services Work with Old Order Mennonites Black Churches in Canada: Vehicles for Fostering Community Development in African Canadian Communities -- A Historical Analysis Islamic Theology and Prayer: Relevance for Social Work Practice Conclusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it