Spirituality and social work : selected Canadian readings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Spirituality as a Guiding Construct in the Development of Canadian Social Work: Past and Present Considerations The Haven, 1878-1930: A Toronto Charitys Transition from a Religious to a Professional Social Work Ethos The Social Gospel Excerpts from The Values of Life Moral and Spiritual Values in Social Work Exploring the Spiritual Dimension of Social Work The Helpfulness of Spiritually Influenced Group Work in Developing Self-Awareness and Self-Esteem: A Preliminary Investigation Listening to our Stillness: Giving Voice to Our Spirituality (Spirituality & Clinical Practice) Reframing Spirituality, Reconceptualising Change: Possibilities for Critical Social Work Feminist Community Organising: The Spectre of the Sacred and the Secular Engaging with Spirituality: A Qualitative Study of Grief and HIV/AIDS Circles of Resistance: Spirituality and Transformative Change in Social Work Education and Practice From Ecology to Spirituality and Social Justice Profound Connections between Person and Place: Exploring Location, Spirituality, and Social Work Spirituality, Stress and Work Making Circles: Renewing First Nations Ways of Helping Communities in Co-operation: Human Services Work with Old Order Mennonites Black Churches in Canada: Vehicles for Fostering Community Development in African Canadian Communities -- A Historical Analysis Islamic Theology and Prayer: Relevance for Social Work Practice Conclusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.019 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.023 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".