Real life applications of bio-inspired computing models: EAP and NEPs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A great deal of research efiort is currently being made in the realm of natural computing. Natural computing mainly focuses on the definition, formal description, analysis, simulation and programming of new models of computation (usually with the same expressive power as Turing Machines) inspired by Nature. It also concerns algorithms inspired by natural processes, which are especially accurate for problems dealing with complex systems or approximate solutions. These new models have difierent interests. Firstly, their main features, like intrinsic parallelism/distributivity, makes them particularly suitable for the simu- lation of complex systems. Secondly, they could lead to a new paradigm of com- puters, which is particularly important, as the von Neumann architecture and its conventional implementation with silicon-based technologies is reaching its theoret- ical limits. Last but not least, their parallel nature makes them capable of treating NP problems eficiently. However, they also have some counterparts. Most of them consist of many ele- ments behaving in a coordinated fashion, creating a global complex behaviour from very simple local decisions. For this reason, the fundamentals of their functioning are often dificult to understand. In the same manner, the task of designing or programming these kinds of devices faces many dificulties. During our work, we have tried to contribute to this field of research by develop- ing and studying a framework for the simulation and programming of a bio-inspired computing model called Networks of Evolutionary Processors (NEPs) [Castellanos et al., 2001]. We have also investigated its application to NP problems and to the field of Natural Language Processing. In addition, since designing and program- ming NEPs and other natural systems is a complex task, we have proposed and studied a general methodology that permits the automatic design or programming of complex systems. This methodology is based on the Grammatical Evolution (GE) algorithm and its modern variants like Christiansen Grammar Evolution or Attribute Grammar Evolution [Echeandia et al., 2005]. GE is an algorithm inspired by the natural process of evolution and natural selection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".