MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2704526389

Coping strategies used by varsity athletes with a concussion

2014· article· en· W2704526389 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan Isaac, Katherine A. Tamminen, Michael G. Hutchison, Paul Comper

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcussionPsychologyCoping (psychology)AthletesDistressClinical psychologySport psychologyPhysical therapyInjury preventionMedicinePoison controlMedical emergency
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

More than 85% of concussions in individuals between the ages of 16-34 are sports-related (Gordon, Dooley, & Wood, 2006). Concussions are associated with somatic, cognitive, or emotional symptoms and negatively affect the health and quality of life of injured athletes (McCrory et al., 2013). The use of effective coping strategies has been investigated in non-concussed injured athletes (Johnston & Carroll, 2000; Udry, Gould, Bridges, & Beck, 1997) and individuals with concussions (Borg, Holm, Peloso, & Cassidy, 2004; Azulay, Smart, Mott, & Cicierone, 2013). However, little research has investigated the coping strategies used by athletes following concussions. Therefore, this study aims to understand varsity athletes’ experiences of sustaining a concussion and how varsity athletes cope with the effects of concussions. We conducted semi-structured interviews (ranging from 45-70 min, M = 55 min.) with five university varsity athletes (2 male, 3 female, M age = 21) from team and individual sports who sustained a sport-related concussion. Data were analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (Smith, Flowers & Larkin, 2009). Results indicated that after their concussion participants felt removed from all aspects of their life: academics, sport and social. They experienced emotional distress during their gradual return to school and activity. Athletes used social support, emotion focused coping strategies and problem focused coping strategies to facilitate their recovery. Athletes discussed advice they would provide to a fellow varsity athlete with a concussion, including being honest with yourself and your medical staff, and surrounding yourself with a strong social support system. This research addresses some of the challenges associated with following a step-wise return to sport/school protocol and some of the coping strategies that may facilitate varsity athletes’ rehabilitation process. Keywords: concussed athlete, recovery, social support, phenomenological, qualitative

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTraumatic Brain Injury Research→French-language works237,207→