La pratique sociologique entre les illusions de la méthode et les mirages de la technique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les sciences sociales ont repoussé « la condition humaine » hors de leur champ de compétence. Seules ont fini par compter des « déterminations » élaborées sur le mode de causalités « démontrées » selon des manipulations mathématiques. Cette façon de faire empruntée aux sciences de la nature a vite recherché à ces démonstrations des applications « pratiques », au bénéfice, pour faire bref, de diverses modalités de contrôle social. Aux sciences sociales est désormais dévolue une finalité technique, à savoir « résoudre les problèmes sociaux ». Cela signifie gérer et contrôler divers espaces sociaux de manière rationnelle, ou qui se veut telle. Ce qui fait problème, à notre époque, c’est la réduction de ces sciences au simple rang de recettes de consolidation, de replâtrage ou de réforme ponctuelle de l’ordre social existant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.126 | 0.124 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.067 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".