MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Infants with Intestinal Failure at 12 and 26 Months Corrected Age

2017· article· en· W2714265996 on OpenAlexaff
Stephanie So, Anna Gold, Catherine Patterson, Alaine Rogers, Christina Belza, Nicole de Silva, Yaron Avitzur, Paul W. Wales

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfant Development and Preterm Care
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterquartile rangeMedicineGestational agePediatricsGross motor skillBirth weightVineland Adaptive Behavior ScaleCohortProspective cohort studyMotor skillPregnancyInternal medicineAutismPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Survival of infants with intestinal failure (IF) has improved, yet multiple medical factors may impact development. This study examines neurodevelopmental outcomes at 12–15 and 26–32 months corrected age in a cohort of children with IF. Methods: Prospective single centre neurodevelopmental assessments of children admitted to an intestinal rehabilitation program between 2011–2014. Outcome measures include: Mullen Scales of Early Learning (12 and 26 months) and Vineland-II Adaptive Behavior Scales (26 months). Standard scores were correlated with medical and demographic factors. Results: Thirty-one children (17 males), median gestational age 34 weeks (interquartile range (IQR) 30–36) with birth weight (BW) 2.12 kilograms (IQR 1.24-2.52). Ten (32.2%) were dependent on parental nutrition (PN) at the second assessment. At 12 months, 11/30 (36.7%) scored below average (>1 standard deviation below mean) on the Early Learning (EL) composite and 24/30 (80%) were below average on the Gross Motor (GM) subscale. Comparatively, at 26 months, mean EL scores were significantly lower, most notably in Visual Reception (VR) and Fine Motor (FM) subscales (p=.001). Mean GM scores remained low, and parents reported the lowest scores on the motor domain of the Vineland-II. At 12–15 months, factors significantly (p<.05) associated with lower scores are primarily related to prematurity: lower VR scores correlate with lower BW (r= −.469) and longer neonatal intensive care admission (r= −.384), while lower FM scores correlate with longer NICU (r= −.442) and hospital (r= −.431) admissions. At 26–32 months, the impact of IF-related variables, over and above early neonatal influences are more apparent. There is a significant correlation between lower FM scores and longer hospital admissions (r= −.392), while lower GM scores correlate with shorter small bowel length (r= .393) and greater PN days (r= −.506). Total PN days remain significant even when adjusting for prematurity. Additional significant risk factors include: central nervous system co-morbidities, necrotizing enterocolitis etiology and history of sustained conjugated bilirubin. Conclusion: Children with IF are at risk of developmental delay in multiple domains. While gross motor skills appear to be most significantly affected, early learning deficits become more apparent at >2 years of age, which could impact future school performance. Early developmental follow up and intervention are important for this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantationSame topicInfant Development and Preterm CareFrench-language works237,207