MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W271517858 · doi:10.46867/ijcp.2010.23.01.07

A Y-maze Choice Task Fails to Detect Alcohol Avoidance or Alcohol Preference in Zebrafish

2010· article· en· W271517858 on OpenAlexaff
Stephanie L. Grella, Neeru Kapur, Robert Gerlai

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Comparative Psychology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicZebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
Canadian institutionsCollege of Family Physicians of CanadaUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and AlcoholismNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsZebrafishAlcoholPsychologyStimulus (psychology)T-mazeAvoidance learningPreferenceDevelopmental psychologyPhysiologyNeuroscienceCognitive psychologyMedicineBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The zebrafish has been proposed for the analysis of the neurobiological and behavioral effects of alcohol in vertebrates. Significant behavioral changes induced by acute alcohol treatment, adaptation to chronic alcohol exposure, and withdrawal induced behavioral responses have all been shown in zebrafish. Previously, a flow-through Y-maze paradigm was proposed to directly measure alcohol preference or avoidance in zebrafish without the need to train learning-based place preference. Here, we first demonstrate that this Y-maze paradigm is capable of quantifying preference for a positive stimulus (the sight of conspecifics) and also the avoidance of a negative stimulus, a noxious olfactory cue, denatonium benzoate. Second, we test whether naïve zebrafish avoid alcohol upon first encountering this substance, and whether fish chronically exposed to alcohol show preference, or acutely alcohol treated fish show signs of intoxication leading to random choice. Our results demonstrate that acute alcohol treated fish exhibit enhanced immobility and perform at chance but chronic alcohol treated fish are not intoxicated and swim as well as naïve fish, a finding compatible with the known intoxicating effect of acute alcohol and the adaptation expected after chronic alcohol exposure. However, despite the general feasibility of the task, neither alcohol preference, nor alcohol avoidance could be detected in any of our treatment groups. We discuss the possible reasons why differential alcohol vs. freshwater choice was not found in this task and propose follow up experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.567

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Comparative PsychologySame topicZebrafish Biomedical Research ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207