MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2716499615 · doi:10.1007/s00300-017-2139-7

Background invertebrate herbivory on dwarf birch (Betula glandulosa-nana complex) increases with temperature and precipitation across the tundra biome

2017· article· en· W2716499615 on OpenAlexafffund
Isabel C. Barrio, Elin Lindén, Mariska te Beest, Johan Olofsson, Adrian V. Rocha, Eeva M. Soininen, Juha M. Alatalo, Tommi Andersson, Ashley Asmus, Julia Boike, Kari Anne Bråthen, John P. Bryant, Agata Buchwał, C. Guillermo Bueno, Katherine S. Christie, Yu. V. Denisova, Dagmar Egelkraut, Dorothée Ehrich, LeeAnn Fishback, Bruce C. Forbes, Maite Gartzia, Paul Grogan, Martin Hallinger, Monique Heijmans, David S. Hik, Annika Hofgaard, Milena Holmgren, Toke T. Høye, Diane C. Huebner, Ingibjörg S. Jónsdóttir, Elina Kaarlejärvi, Timo Kumpula, Cynthia Y. M. J. G. Lange, Jelena Lange, Esther Lévesque, Juul Limpens, Marc Macias‐Fauria, Isla H. Myers‐Smith, E.J. van Nieukerken, Signe Normand, Eric Post, Niels Martin Schmidt, Judith Sitters, Anna Skoracka, Natalia Sokolova, James D. M. Speed, Lorna E. Street, Maja K. Sundqvist, Otso Suominen, Nikita Tananaev, Jean‐Pierre Tremblay, Christine Urbanowicz, S A Uvarov, David A. Watts, Martin Wilmking, Philip A. Wookey, Heike Zimmermann, Vitali Zverev, Mikhail V. Kozlov

Bibliographic record

VenuePolar Biology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityCenter for Northern StudiesUniversité LavalNordic Life Science Pipeline (Canada)University of AlbertaUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresChurchill Northern Studies Centre
FundersNatural Environment Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaVlaamse regeringKempestiftelsernaFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekRussian Academy of SciencesAcademy of FinlandNorges ForskningsrådRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchSight Research UKDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekUS-UK Fulbright CommissionAXA Research FundVillum Fonden
KeywordsTundraHerbivoreBiomeBiologyEcologyInvertebrateBetula pubescensEcosystem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePolar Biology→Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→