PREFERENTIAL ORIENTATION OF SHRIMP-GENERATED <i>DIPLOCRATERION PARALLELUM</i> AND THEIR RELIABILITY AS PALEOCURRENT INDICATORS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Arthropods from the late Campanian (Late Cretaceous) of the Western Interior Seaway produced U-shaped Diplocraterion parallelum in mudstones along two closely spaced surfaces (10 cm apart), one of which corresponds to a maximum transgressive surface. Diplocraterion parallelum are widely distributed across both surfaces, with substantial variations in burrow orientations. Based on a comparison of paleocurrent indicators to burrow orientations, we demonstrate that D. parallelum are preferentially oriented parallel to the prevailing fair-weather wave propagation direction (wave-forced currents) that acted upon the colonized surfaces. There is an apparent maximum (34% above uniformity) preferential orientation of the burrows, attributed to the fact that wave-forced currents represent only one of several factors controlling shrimp burrowing behaviors. Based on this study, we propose that in the absence of paleocurrent data, Diplocraterion and other U-shaped burrows can be used to resolve flow directions, and that preferential burrow orientations ≥ 2% above uniformity are significant. However, it is noted that it is only possible to resolve 2-way flow directions (trend) from U-shaped burrows, as there is no way to determine vector directions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".