MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2724441451 · doi:10.14740/ijcp260w

Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis and Ovarian Teratoma: A Case Report

2017· article· en· W2724441451 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sonoko Kubota, Tatsuo Fuchigami, Emiko Momoki, Reina Hoshi, Takeshi Furuya, Yoshiaki Kusumi, Wakako Ishii, Yuki I. Kawamura, Yukihiko Fujita, Shori Takahashi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Clinical Pediatrics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKanazawa Medical University
KeywordsOvarian TeratomaMedicineTeratomaUnconsciousnessEncephalitisNMDA receptorGirlAntibodyAnesthesiaInternal medicineSurgeryReceptorImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis is often associated with ovarian teratomas in young women. However, children are less likely to develop this condition. We herein report a very rare case of anti-NMDAR encephalitis and an ovarian teratoma in a young girl. A previously healthy 9-year-old girl presented with convulsions and unconsciousness. Her cerebral spinal fluid was positive for anti-NMDAR antibody. She underwent immunotherapy, and although her clinical course improved, she did not fully recover. A right ovarian teratoma was then found and removed, and she became negative for anti-NMDAR antibody. She exhibited almost full recovery and no relapse. Tumor resection is recommended in the treatment of anti-NMDAR encephalitis. A tumor search should be actively carried out in patients aged < 12 years. Int J Clin Pediatr. 2017;6(1-2):20-23 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/ijcp260w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.484
Teacher spread0.406 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Clinical PediatricsSame topicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207