Fifty-eighth supplement to the American Ornithological Society's<i>Check-list of North American Birds</i>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
p. xii.The exclusion of Greenland from the AOS geographical area is reversed.Under the section Geographic Coverage, change reference to the eastern boundary of the AOS geographical area from ''the boundary between Canada and Greenland'' to ''Greenland.'' Greenland is geographically, physiographically, and tectonically part of North America, and was considered part of the area of coverage from the first (AOU 1886) through the fifth editions of the Check-list (AOU 1957).In the 6th edition (AOU 1983), however, Greenland was removed from the area, and seven species included only on the basis of records from Greenland were transferred to the hypothetical list (Appendix B in that edition).We return six of these species (Tadorna ferruginea, Rallus aquaticus, Charadrius veredus, Corvus frugilegus, C. cornix, and Anthus pratensis; the seventh species, Platalea leucorodia, was returned in Chesser et al. 2010) from the Appendix to the main list, some with updated taxonomy, and add three new species (Sylvia atricapilla, Zoothera aurea, and Acanthis cabaret) on the basis of additional records from Greenland (Boertmann 1994) in the appropriate sequence in the taxonomic section below.In addition, four species already on the main list (Anser brachyrhynchus, Pluvialis apricaria, Turdus pilaris, and T. iliacus) are no longer considered accidental, due to breeding in Greenland, and the code '' A'' is removed from their names.pp.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it