MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2724800520 · doi:10.1111/fwb.12964

Depth distribution of the native freshwater mussel (<i>Echyridella menziesii</i>) in warm monomictic lakes: Towards a general model for mussels in lakes

2017· article· en· W2724800520 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hélène Cyr, Ngaire Phillips, Joseph Butterworth

Bibliographic record

VenueFreshwater Biology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersHumanities Research Center, Rice UniversityUniversity of Waikato
KeywordsMusselBenthic zoneZebra musselEnvironmental scienceRange (aeronautics)UnionidaeOceanographyEpilimnionTransectBivalviaEcologyFisheryGeologyEutrophicationMolluscaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Freshwater mussels are large, long‐lived and can be important contributors to benthic biomass and processes. They are currently one of the most endangered groups of organisms and it is urgent to develop tools to predict their distribution and the potential effect of their decline or disappearance on these ecosystems. Cyr ( ) showed that the distribution of Elliptio complanata (Unionidae) in Canadian Shield lakes is constrained by physical forces. Here we test Cyr's model in a very different group of mussels (Hyriidae), in different types of lakes (warm monomictic lakes) that cover a wider range of sizes and morphologies. We use data on the depth distribution of Echyridella menziesii along 38 depth transects in 11 warm monomictic lakes located in New Zealand to test three hypotheses: (1) wave‐mixed depth and bottom slope are good predictors of the depth of maximum mussel density, (2) thermocline depth does not limit the distribution of mussels in warm monomictic lakes, and (3) the lower boundary of mussel distribution is determined by the mud deposition boundary. Mussels in New Zealand lakes reach their maximum density within the epilimnion, at increasing depths with increasing lake size and increasing site exposure. The only exceptions were found in large lakes or parts of large lakes with shallow bathymetric slopes, where high mussel densities were found in relatively shallow waters. Mussel density peaks are found much deeper in the volcanic New Zealand lakes than in (glacial) Canadian Shield lakes, a discrepancy we hypothesise could be due to lower sediment stability along the steep slopes of volcanic lakes. Mussels appear to have a very broad range of depth distribution in these warm monomictic lakes. The deepest samples collected in deep oligotrophic lakes (down to 12–30 m) all contained mussels, often in substantial numbers (up to 2–186 mussels/m 2 ), and can only offer a minimal estimate of the lower boundary of their distribution. However, the distribution of mussels in highly productive lakes is limited by hypolimnetic anoxia, and therefore by position of the thermocline. Echyridella menziesii are found in a wide range of substrates. Mussels were found below the mud deposition boundary in many lakes, suggesting that the presence of fine flocculent organic sediments does not prevent them from living in deep areas. The distribution of E. menziesii in warm monomictic lakes appears to be governed by relatively simple physical processes. This supports findings for a very different group of mussels in Canadian Shield lakes and suggests that general models could be developed to predict the distribution of mussels in lakes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score0.835

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFreshwater BiologySame topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207