MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 17973: Clinical Markers Associated With Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Otherwise Apparently Healthy Young Adults

2015· article· en· W2725646609 on OpenAlexaff
Stéphanie LeBlanc, Karine Bibeau, Élianne De Larochellière, Philippe Pîbarot, Jean‐Pierre Després, Éric Larose

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsInstitut national de psychiatrie légale Philippe-PinelInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDyslipidemiaWaistInternal medicineAnthropometryDiabetes mellitusLipid profilePopulationCardiologyYoung adultBlood pressureDiseaseObesityCholesterolEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Traditional risk factors are poor predictors of cardiovascular events in younger adults. Considering the long silent evolution of atherosclerosis beginning in younger adulthood before the appearance of clinical events at a more advanced age, a simple tool to predict early atherosclerosis in young adults would be desirable to guide primordial prevention. An altered cardiometabolic profile is associated with increased cardiovascular disease in older adults independent from traditional risk factors, but the value of this profile in an otherwise healthy young adult population is unknown. Hypothesis: Cardiometabolic risk markers would be associated with early atherosclerosis in young adults despite the absence of traditional risk factors. Methods: Healthy young adults (18-35 years) devoid of cardiovascular risk factors (diabetes, smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia) and obesity were prospectively enrolled. Anthropometric measurements, ECG, lipid profile, fasting blood glucose, blood pressure and high-resolution carotid artery MRI were realized. Results: Although the 240 participants (25.8 years, SEM=0.29, 48% women) were at low risk for atherosclerosis, we identified atherosclerosis in 72.6% of men and 64.7% of women (p=0.19). Males had greater atherosclerosis burden vs. females (carotid wall volume [CWV]: 1817 mm3/48mm, SEM=29.7 vs. 1579 mm3/48mm, SEM=21.2; p<0.0001). By multivariate analysis, atherosclerosis burden was associated with fasting blood glucose (p=0.01), BMI (p=0.01), and waist circumference (p<0.001), the latter having the strongest correlation with atherosclerosis burden (r=0.41, p<0.0001). ROC analyses established cutoffs for waist circumference identifying greater atherosclerosis burden in apparently healthy young adults. Conclusion: A simple low-cost office-based tool, waist circumference measurement improves prediction of early atherosclerosis in otherwise apparently healthy young adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207