MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Canadian CADASIL Kindred: How sensitive is a skin biopsy?

2001· article· en· W2725776492 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bart M. Demaerschalk, Patrick MacLeod, Donald H. Lee, Robert Hammond, Peter Ainsworth, Sherry K Musyj, Vladimir Hachinski

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and genetic disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCADASILMedicineSkin biopsyLeukoencephalopathyMigraineBiopsyMigraine with auraPathologyAsymptomaticMuscle biopsyStroke (engine)DementiaGenetic testingMagnetic resonance imagingRadiologyAuraDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

87 Background: Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is an inherited arterial disease of mid-adulthood resulting from mutations of the Notch3 gene on chromosome 19. The presence of granular and osmiophilic material surrounding smooth muscle cells visualized under electron microscopy in a skin biopsy allows confirmation of the intra vitam diagnosis. The literature suggests that skin biopsy can establish the diagnosis with high certainty and that it be considered the diagnostic method of first choice. Until the sensitivity and specificity have rigorously been assessed, results from such tests should be interpreted with caution. Objective: To raise some concerns about the possible lack of sensitivity of skin biopsy in the early diagnosis of CADASIL by describing the second large Canadian kindred with this condition. Methods: All siblings of this family in which there was a clinical suspicion of CADASIL underwent neurological evaluation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), skin biopsy, and genetic testing. Findings: Nine siblings ranged in age from 40 to 63 years. Two (aged 60 and 62) presented with dementia, strokes, and depression, two (aged 58 and 63) presented with stroke and migraine with aura, three (aged 40, 48, and 51) presented with only migraine with aura, and two (aged 53 and 57) were asymptomatic. Eight consented to diagnostic evaluation. All eight siblings’ DNA-sequence analysis of the Notch3 gene revealed an Arg207Cys mutation in exon 4. All have MRI scans consistent with a diagnosis of CADASIL. Full thickness skin biopsies from all eight were submitted for histopathological and ultrastructural examination. Granular electron dense osmiophilic material was not found in any of the material submitted. Conclusions: In addition to providing an illustrative clinical example of the broad phenotypic variation of CADASIL in a Canadian kindred, this family demonstrates how insensitive the skin biopsy might be. The sensitivity and specificity of various non-genetic diagnostic tests such as skin and muscle biopsy must be rigorously assessed before claiming them as standards for screening or diagnosing CADASIL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.471
Threshold uncertainty score0.892

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicCerebrovascular and genetic disordersFrench-language works237,207