MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2725785615 · doi:10.3389/fneur.2017.00300

Serial Sampling of Serum Protein Biomarkers for Monitoring Human Traumatic Brain Injury Dynamics: A Systematic Review

2017· review· en· W2725785615 on OpenAlexaff
Eric Peter Thelin, Frederick A. Zeiler, Ari Ercole, Stefania Mondello, András Büki, Bo‐Michael Bellander, Adel Helmy, David Menon, David Nelson

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neurology · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicS100 Proteins and Annexins
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research CentreMedical Research CouncilRoyal College of Surgeons of EnglandEuropean CommissionSvenska LäkaresällskapetCambridge Commonwealth TrustNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsTraumatic brain injuryMedicineNeuroscienceSampling (signal processing)BiologyComputer sciencePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The proteins S100B, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) and neurofilament light (NF-L) have been serially sampled in serum of patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI) in order to assess injury severity and tissue fate. We review the current literature of serum level dynamics of these proteins following TBI and used the term “effective half-life” (t½) in order to describe the “fall” rate in serum Material and methods: Through searches on EMBASE, Medline and Scopus, we looked for articles where these proteins had been serially sampled in serum in human TBI. We excluded animal studies, studies with only one presented sample and studies without neuroradiological examinations. Results: Following screening (10,389 papers), n=122 papers were included. The proteins S100B (n=66) and NSE (n=27) were the two most frequent biomarkers that were serially sampled. For S100B in severe TBI, a majority of studies indicate a t½ of about 24 hours, even if very early sampling in these patients reveals rapid decreases (1-2 hours) though possibly of non-cerebral origin. In contrast, the t½ for NSE is comparably longer, ranging from 48-72 hours in severe TBI cases. The protein GFAP (n=18) appears to have t½ of about 24-48 hours in severe TBI. The protein UCH-L1 (n=9) present a t½ around 7 hours in mild TBI, and about 10 hours in severe. Frequent sampling of these proteins revealed different trajectories with persisting high serum levels, or secondary peaks, in patients with unfavorable outcome or in patients developing secondary detrimental events. Finally, NF-L (n=2) only increased in the few studies available, suggesting a serum availability >10 days. To date, automated assays are available for S100B and NSE making them faster and more practical to use. Conclusion: Serial sampling of brain specific proteins in serum reveals different temporal trajectories that should be acknowledged. Proteins with shorter serum availability, like S100B, may be superior to proteins such as NF-L in detection of secondary harmful events when monitoring patients with TBI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0110.011
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations251
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeurologySame topicS100 Proteins and AnnexinsFrench-language works237,207