Abstract 157: The Sex-Specific Influence of Adiposity on Blood Pressure During Physical and Mental Challenges in Adolescence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Greater blood pressure (BP) reactivity and slower BP recovery from physical and mental challenges predict future hypertension. Males exhibit higher BP than females throughout their reproductive age and, as such, have a higher prevalence of hypertension. Excess body-fat is a major risk factor for hypertension in both males and females. We investigated whether BP reactivity and recovery from physical and mental challenges differ between adolescent males and females, and whether these hemodynamic parameters are associated with resting BP and are influenced by excess body-fat in a sex-specific manner. In 285 male and 311 female adolescents (age 12-18 years), we quantified visceral fat (VF) with magnetic resonance imaging and total body fat (TBF) with bioimpedance and measured systolic BP (SBP) beat-by-beat at rest and during physical (10-min standing) and mental (2-min math test) challenges. Our results showed that in both sexes, BP reactivity and BP recovery for both challenges (adjusted for age, height and initial BP) correlated closely with resting BP (0.03 ≤ r2 ≤ 0.34). In addition, for both physical and mental challenges, males versus females showed greater BP reactivity (by 3.5 mm Hg, p<0.0001 and by 2.6 mmHg, p=0.02, respectively) and no difference in BP recovery. VF correlated positively with BP reactivity to the physical challenge only and in males only (r=0.18, p=0.007), and this correlation was independent of TBF (r=0.21, p=0.002). Consistent with these results, additional adjustment for VF diminished the sex difference in BP reactivity to the physical but not mental challenge (from 3.5 to 2.7 mm Hg, p=0.01). No relationship was observed between VF and BP recovery from either challenge and in either sex. This is the first study to show sex differences exist not only in BP adaptation to daily activities, but also in the way VF influences this adaptation. Overall, our findings suggest the need for sex-specific prevention and treatment of hypertension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".