MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2726668484

ACUERDAN UNIVERSIDADES DE MÉXICO, EU Y CANADÁ CREAR EJE DE COOPERACIÓN CIENTÍFICA

2017· article· es· W2726668484 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sin Autor, Foto Benjamín Chaires

Bibliographic record

VenueGaceta UNAM (2010-2019) · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EL RECTOR ENRIQUE GRAUE WIECHERS RECIBIO AYER EN SU OFICINA A PETER MCPHERSON, PRESIDENTE DE LA ASOCIACION DE UNIVERSIDADES PUBLICAS (APLU, POR SUS SIGLAS EN INGLES). EN ESTA VISITA SE ACORDO, ENTRE OTRAS COSAS, INICIAR LA ELABORACION DE UN CONVENIO EN FAVOR DE LA INVESTIGACION CIENTIFICA ENTRE LAS PRINCIPALES UNIVERSIDADES PUBLICAS DE LOS TRES PAISES QUE CONFORMAN EL TRATADO DE LIBRE COMERCIO: CANADA, ESTADOS UNIDOS Y MEXICO. MCPHERSON PUBLICO, EL PASADO 26 DE ENERO, UNA CARTA EN LA QUE AFIRMO QUE LAS UNIVERSIDADES ESTADUNIDENSES SE ENRIQUECEN Y SE FORTALECEN CON EL TALENTO, VISION Y LA CULTURA DE LOS ALUMNOS INTERNACIONALES, LOS CUALES DEBEN CONTINUAR SUS ESTUDIOS. ES EN ESTE CONTEXTO QUE LA UNAM Y LA APLU UNIRAN ESFUERZOS PARA CONVOCAR A SUS HOMOLOGOS Y CREAR LA ALIANZA DE UNIVERSIDADES EN FAVOR DE LA CIENCIA. LA APLU, FUNDADA EN 1887, ES LA ASOCIACION DE EDUCACION SUPERIOR MAS ANTIGUA DE EU Y ESTA COMPUESTA POR 238 UNIVERSIDADES PUBLICAS DE INVESTIGACION, INSTITUCIONES DE CONCESION DE TIERRAS Y SISTEMAS UNIVERSITARIOS DE ESTADOS UNIDOS, CANADA Y MEXICO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0170.004
Scholarly communication0.0090.003
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGaceta UNAM (2010-2019)Same topicHigher Education in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207