MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2726918412 · doi:10.1021/acsami.7b05571

Growth and Characterization of Metastable Hexagonal Nickel Thin Films via Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition

2017· article· en· W2726918412 on OpenAlexafffund
Pouyan Motamedi, Ken Bosnick, Kai Cui, Ken Cadien, James D. Hogan

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaNational Institute for NanotechnologyUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Research Council CanadaDefence Research and Development Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceAtomic layer depositionThin filmNickelDeposition (geology)Layer (electronics)MicroelectronicsCarbon filmPulsed laser depositionNanotechnologyChemical engineeringOptoelectronicsMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a great interest in various branches of the advanced materials industry for the development of novel methods (and improvements to existing ones) for the deposition of conformal ultrathin metallic films. In most of these applications, like enhanced solar absorbers and microelectronics, achieving the capacity to deposit a conformal thin film on a three-dimensional structure is an important condition. Plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition (ALD) is known for its potential for growth of conformal thin films with a precise control over the thickness and its capability for deposition at relatively low temperatures (below 500 °C). This study evaluates the potential of plasma-enhanced ALD for growth of conformal nickel thin films, using bis(ethylcyclopentadienyl)nickel and nitrogen/hydrogen plasma as precursors. A comprehensive analysis of the structure, composition, and physical properties of the films was performed. The results indicate that conformal nickel films with low levels of impurity were successfully deposited on sapphire. The films had a roughness of R a = 1.5 nm and were seen to be under strain. The deposited nickel had a hexagonal crystal structure, with a random in-plane orientation of the grains, while the grains had their c -axes oriented along the normal to the interface. These results pave the way for conformal low-temperature deposition of high-quality nickel thin films on three-dimensional structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.884

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Materials & InterfacesSame topicSemiconductor materials and devicesFrench-language works237,207