ACCREDITATION IN THE EU: A FIRST STEP IN BENCHMARKING GERONTOLOGY PROGRAMS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Dutch and Flemish accreditation systems of higher education regulate educational quality of programs. Foundations include Dublin descriptors and ten general competencies of higher education. AGEC is an important body for benchmarking gerontology programs in an international context. This will enhance improve faculty and student movement and exchange. For that reason, a Dutch BSc program in Applied Gerontology applies Associaton for Gerontology in Higher Education (AGHE) competencies in 3 different ways: (1) as input of programs’ core competencies; (2) as core for the development of learning outcomes; and (3) as input for learning objectives in classes. We present our method of mapping Dublin Descriptors; general competencies of higher education and the AGHE competencies on program and class levels. Our method promotes unequivocal use of AGHE competences in the international arena of gerontology education. It may serve as a point of reference for other European programs in gerontology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it