MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2728405121 · doi:10.1177/001458581204600207

Between Myth and Mythology: The Multiple Ulysses in Cesare Pavese's <i>La luna e i falò</i>

2012· article· en· W2728405121 on OpenAlexaff
Antonio Viselli

Bibliographic record

VenueForum Italicum A Journal of Italian Studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGiambattista Vico and Joyce
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMythologyIntertextualityLiteratureMeaning (existential)Reading (process)Character (mathematics)ArtPhilosophyLinguisticsEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The following article offers an intertextual and paradigmatic reading of the omnipresent figure of Ulysses in Cesare Pavese's final novel, La luna e i falò. By minutely regrouping as a collage the different facets of Ulysses/Odysseus as represented in literature — namely Homer's Odysseus, Dante's Ulysses and Joyce's Leopold Bloom — Pavese reconstitutes an impossible nostos or return home for his orphaned protagonist Anguilla, a character whose actions take on further meaning when analyzed alongside his paradigmatic counterparts. I argue that only once these intertexts are reconstituted and a vertical reading expounded, may the reader comprehend the minute textual intricacies of La luna e i falò and the manner in which Pavese — whose lurking autobiographical presence within the novel is also brought to light by intertextuality — aesthetically makes sense of a specific socio-political climate in which myth and mythology stand in contradistinction to the quotidian.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.035
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueForum Italicum A Journal of Italian StudiesSame topicGiambattista Vico and JoyceFrench-language works237,207