MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2728976606 · doi:10.25046/aj020383

Human Robot Interaction for Hybrid Collision Avoidance System for Indoor Mobile Robots

2017· article· en· W2728976606 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mazen Ghandour, Hui Liu, Norbert Stoll, Kerstin Thurow

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Science Technology and Engineering Systems Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungDeutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
KeywordsCollision avoidanceRobotMobile robotHuman–computer interactionComputer scienceHuman–robot interactionCollisionSimulationArtificial intelligenceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a novel approach for collision avoidance for indoor mobile robots based on human-robot interaction is realized.The main contribution of this work is a new technique for collision avoidance by engaging the human and the robot in generating new collisionfree paths.In mobile robotics, collision avoidance is critical for the success of the robots in implementing their tasks, especially when the robots navigate in crowded and dynamic environments, which include humans.Traditional collision avoidance methods deal with the human as a dynamic obstacle, without taking into consideration that the human will also try to avoid the robot, and this causes the people and the robot to get confused, especially in crowded social places such as restaurants, hospitals, and laboratories.To avoid such scenarios, a reactive-supervised collision avoidance system for mobile robots based on human-robot interaction is implemented.In this method, both the robot and the human will collaborate in generating the collision avoidance via interaction.The person will notify the robot about the avoidance direction via interaction, and the robot will search for the optimal collision-free path on the selected direction.In case that no people interacted with the robot, it will select the navigation path autonomously and select the path that is closest to the goal location.The humans will interact with the robot using gesture recognition and Kinect sensor.To build the gesture recognition system, two models were used to classify these gestures, the first model is Back-Propagation Neural Network (BPNN), and the second model is Support Vector Machine (SVM).Furthermore, a novel collision avoidance system for avoiding the obstacles is implemented and integrated with the HRI system.The system is tested on H20 robot from DrRobot Company (Canada) and a set of experiments were implemented to report the performance of the system in interacting with the human and avoiding collisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Science Technology and Engineering Systems JournalSame topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207