Utility of somatosensory evoked potentials in the assessment of response to IVIG in a long-lasting case of chronic immune sensory polyradiculopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic immune sensory polyradiculopathy (CISP) identifies a progressive acquired peripheral dysimmune neuropathy recognized as a chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) variant. We describe a young woman with a thirteen-year history of CISP with a belated variable response to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and an almost erratic anticipation of symptoms between IVIG cycles. The association of IVIG and corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, plasmapheresis, did not lead to clinical improvement and was characterized by significant side effects. We evaluated a combined clinical and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) approach aimed to identify possible predictive parameters concerning the effect and duration of each IVIG administration. Neurologic disability was evaluated using INCAT - Overall Disability Sum Score (INCAT-ODSS). CASE PRESENTATION: A 30-year-old woman presented on 2004 for the subacute onset of asymmetric paresthesias in the lower limbs over the previous six months. The symptoms had been relapsing-remitting during the first four months, followed by a slow progression, resulting in limbs ataxia and a progressive gait disturbance requiring Canadian crutches. Motor and sensory nerve conduction studies and electromyographic evaluation were into normal limits. Median SSEPs were normal, while tibial SSEPs were characterised by the bilateral absence of both lumbar and cortical responses. Cerebrospinal fluid detected an increased protein concentration, while spinal MRI showed a pronounced thickening of the sacral nerve roots, together with a tube-shaped enlargement. These findings led to the diagnosis of CISP and the patient was treated with IVIG reaching a stable remission over the following 9 years. In early 2014, the patient began to show a variable response to treatment with erratic anticipation of sensory disturbances, and a more pronounced walking disability: corticosteroids, plasmapheresis, mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide were uneffective and burdened by relevant side effects. To better assess the response to IVIG in terms of time-effect, consistency and duration, we have combined a scheduled clinical and SSEPs evaluation during and after each IVIG cycle. CONCLUSIONS: The correlation between the neurophysiological data and the INCAT-ODSS scores has allowed the modulation of IVIG cycles with a significant reduction of the clinical fluctuations and disability. SSEPs may therefore represent an useful and recommended additional aid for the treatment schedule of this rare clinical form.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".