Savoir romanesque et parcours axiologique dans <i>Tarmac</i> de Nicolas Dickner et <i>Mayonnaise</i> d’Éric Plamondon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s’intéresse à l’interrogation axiologique dans deux œuvres québécoises contemporaines qui développent un savoir romanesque singulier: Tarmac (2009) de Nicolas Dickner et Mayonnaise (2012) d’Éric Plamondon. J’étudie comment les visions du monde véhiculées dans chacun des textes entrent en contradiction avec les savoirs acquis. Je montre que le roman de Dickner, en misant sur un “savoir de l’inessentiel,” transforme l’obsession à l’égard de la fin du monde en un conflit du narrateur à l’égard de la vision du monde dominante. C’est à travers la notion de “fragments encyclopédiques” que j’explore l’éclatement de la forme romanesque dans Mayonnaise, un roman construit sur la base d’une appropriation et d’un déplacement de Trout Fishing in America (1967) de Richard Brautigan. Je cherche également à illustrer que chez Plamondon, la réflexion axiologique s’articule autour de la notion de suicide, mais surtout comment celle-ci reste inextricablement liée à l’acte d’écrire un roman.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".