MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2730214181

Post-irradiation Examination of the Lower Part of the Phébus FPT2 Degraded Bundle

2010· other· en· W2730214181 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sandrine Schlutig, M. Barrachin, A. De Bremaecker, Walker Clive, D. Papaioannou, S Beatrice

Bibliographic record

VenueJoint Research Centre (European Commission) · 2010
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNuclear Materials and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBundleIrradiationChemistryComputer scienceMaterials sciencePhysicsComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Phébus PF project is an international programme examining the release behaviour of fission products from irradiated fuel. It is led and being carried out by the French Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN) at Cadarache in collaboration with the European Commission, EU national research institutes as well as USA, Canada, Korea, Japan and Switzerland. The FPT1 test examined bundle degradation and release under steam atmosphere while FPT2 was carried out under steam-limited conditions. After an initial campaign of macrophotography and examination of the major features of the degraded bundle at ITU, the PIE (Post Irradiation Examinations) continued with the extraction of six selected sites from different levels to perform microscopic examination and analysis of the structures found there. This paper reports on the initial findings in the lower part of the bundle. The macroscopy confirmed the state of the bundle determined by the immediate post-test X-ray and ¿ tomographies carried out at Cadarache. The bundle, as in previous tests, had a characteristic central cavity and a corium pool at one-third height of the bundle, while the upper part showed substantial oxidation, damage and distortion. The corium pool extended the full width of the bundle and appeared to be deeper than that of FPT1. The corium appears to be fully oxidic and has similar amounts of uranium and zirconium with traces of fission products, structural materials and shroud material. Beneath the pool, the cladding was still substantially oxidized and distorted with some fuel-cladding interaction. There was considerable debris beneath the bundle including zones of corium as well as melted metallic structures that probably originated from cladding and reactor structural materials. The extent of damage indicated that the most extreme temperatures were not achieved at this level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.619
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJoint Research Centre (European Commission)Same topicNuclear Materials and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207