MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2730354864 · doi:10.1109/tr.2017.2715172

Combined Redundancy Allocation and Maintenance Planning Using a Two-Stage Stochastic Programming Model for Multiple Component Systems

2017· article· en· W2730354864 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Xiaoqiang Bei, Nida Chatwattanasiri, David W. Coit, Xiaoyan Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Reliability · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReliability and Maintenance Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaPolytechnique MontréalNational Science Foundation
KeywordsRedundancy (engineering)Component (thermodynamics)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationReliability engineeringStochastic programmingPreventive maintenanceStochastic modellingOptimal maintenanceMaintenance actionsReliability (semiconductor)Selection (genetic algorithm)Maintenance engineeringEngineeringMathematicsMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new modeling approach is presented to optimally and simultaneously design the configuration of a multicomponent system and determine a maintenance plan with uncertain future stress exposure. Traditionally, analytical models for system design and maintenance planning are applied sequentially, but this new model provides an integrated approach to make decisions considering the lifecycle cost of the system. Specifically considering the influence of uncertain future usage stresses on component and system reliability, the integrated redundancy allocation and maintenance planning problem is formulated as a two-stage stochastic programming model with recourse. In this model, the system is exposed to uncertain usage scenarios with their associated probabilities of occurrence or likelihood. The decision variables for the first stage are the selection of component types and the number of components to be used in the system, and these variables are modeled before the uncertainty is revealed. The second-stage variables, involving a recourse function, are the preventive maintenance plan, which defines optimal maintenance times for planned replacement of components under distinct usage scenarios. Numerical examples and sensitivity analysis on series-parallel systems demonstrate applications of the proposed model and provide further insights. The comparisons of the proposed integrated approach to traditional sequential method show advantages of the proposed model in cost saving.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on ReliabilitySame topicReliability and Maintenance OptimizationFrench-language works237,207