Programa de aprendizaje-servicio en la educación superior
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper analyzes qualitatively and quantitatively the social outreach activities at the Technical University of Ambato (UTA), specifically in the Faculty of Humanities and Education, Health Sciences, Law and Social Sciences, to determine and know how knowledge and experience gained through community service activities, contributes to the holistic education of young students and problem solving context. To do this, through this study inquires about the expectations of students, teachers and beneficiaries, developed skills, the training offer, content, methodology, resources, trainers, teaching-learning, communication process, objectives, structures, experience obtained evaluation model, difficulties encountered, as well as leadership and management in higher education, defining this way, cognitive, emotional, social and moral skills needed in the twenty-first century, for the formation of change managers assume purpose the social value of knowledge, participation in charity and service actions energizing the humanist end of training; this research examined whether the education received empower students to transform reality, if there is impact of the educational model of the UTA, expressed in social intervention that improves the living conditions of the beneficiary population. In this way, determine if the service-learning is a tool that promotes transformative education, promotes life skills with the existence of a consistent practice, the university spread on commitment, solidarity and social responsibility of the student.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".