MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2731199295 · doi:10.18260/1-2--12464

Two International Engineering Programs In France

2020· article· en· W2731199295 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ian R. Simpson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Learning Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobalizationInternational languagePolitical scienceSociologyPedagogyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract 3160 Two International Engineering Programs in France Ian R. Simpson ENST Bretagne Introduction Until very recently, France had been notoriously poor at offering high-level engineering programs to international students whose mother tongue was not French. In the author’s opinion two of the reasons for this situation were: • A relatively stultified and non-proactive education system at university level, unable (and perhaps, unwilling) to adapt to the new phenomena of the Europeanisation of educational programs and globalisation, in general. • A belief that the French language would remain a major force on the world’s linguistic stage, on a par with the influence exerted by English, and that no special effort was necessary to encourage international students to choose to come and study in France. As a result of this mistaken attitude, the numbers of international students registering at French Universities and “Grandes Ecoles” declined sharply in the early 1990’s, as many international students saw greater career opportunities for themselves by registering at English-speaking universities in countries such as Australia, Canada, the UK and the USA. The French are also only just beginning to become aware of the economic potential of attracting international students to France, both in terms of profits made from the tuition fees paid by international students and, to a lesser degree, from the future influence which such programs will have over the international students once they have graduated and returned to their home countries. For all of the above reasons, the French Government decided to set up a special agency called EduFrance which, since 1998, has been promoting French education throughout the world. Run jointly by the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, EduFrance has opened centers in several countries and is now present at most major Education Fairs where it offers international students the opportunity to join in the French Education System. (See Figure 1). Another series of programs being offered by many French “Grandes Ecoles” are the “Master of Science” courses, which will be examined later in this paper. This offering is not sponsored by any French government agency, but by the “Grandes Ecoles” themselves. It is a remarkable development on the French educational scene. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.898

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHigher Education Learning PracticesFrench-language works237,207