Affordable Design and Manufacturing of the V-280 Wing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The development of Bell's third-generation tiltrotor, the V-280, places great focus on achieving low cost and robust design simplicity and is demonstrated on the Joint Multi-Role (JMR) Air Vehicle Concept Demonstrator (AVCD). The design and manufacture of the V-280 AVCD wing structure is an example that achieves significant recurring and development cost savings through the infusion of Design for Manufacturing (DFM) principles, advanced materials, robust manufacturing processes, and low-cost developmental tooling. To drive simplicity through all aspects of the design, the V-280 AVCD wing employs a straight, constant section profile with no forward sweep or upward dihedral. Wing skins, spars, and ribs utilize a broad goods layup technique that favors large fabric ply shapes over highly tailored tape plies. This approach has yielded significant reduction in fabrication labor hours (via increased composite material application rates) and has resulted in reduced scrap material. Mechanical assembly hours are also reduced through use of room-temperature paste bonded structure as well as large scale use of determinant assembly methods. Multiple risk reduction test articles, produced concurrently with the design effort, helped to inform and validate the producibility and structural integrity of the final design configuration. New production methods applied to the V-280 demonstrator wing have yielded a projected 57% reduction in total labor hours and a 50% reduction in development tool costs. At the same time, a minimal capital investment profile is supporting the potential production rates necessary for a Future Vertical Lift (FVL) program of record.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".