THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN FRAILTY AND SLEEP QUALITY IN OLDER ADULTS LIVING IN SELF-PAID CARE HOMES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To determine the correlation between frailty and quality of sleep in institutionalized elderly people living in self-paying care homes. This was a cross-sectional study of 158 institutionalized elderly tenants in a self-paying care home in northern Taiwan. The research tools include Chinese version of Edmonton Frail Scale, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Results showed 48.7% of Frailty syndrome, and 40% of poor sleep qualities. We found highly significant correlation (p<0.001) between the scores of ADL, IADL, IPAQ, MMSE, GDS-15 and the scores of EFS, and highly significant correlation (p<0.001) between the scores of ADL, IPAQ, GDS-15 and the scores of PSQI. The degree of frailty and sleep quality were shown to be highly correlated (r = 0.282, p <.001). The significant predictors of sleep quality were identifies as depression,activities of daily living, self-perceived visual function status, and sorce of income.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".