MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2733304612 · doi:10.1061/9780784480786.021

Grouting Techniques Used to Decommission a Flowing Artesian Well

2017· article· en· W2733304612 on OpenAlexaffabout
Justin Bieber, David B. Ward, Samuel Bandimere, N. C. Sargent, Jacqueline Foley, Norm Quail, M J Hinton, M Ulmi

Bibliographic record

VenueGrouting 2017 · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGrouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsGolder Associates (Canada)Public Works and Government Services CanadaNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAquiferGeologyArtesian aquiferCasingBoreholeGeotechnical engineeringDrillingAquifer testGeomorphologyGroundwaterPetroleum engineeringGroundwater rechargeEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1965, during drilling of an investigative borehole located on the Coldstream Ranch lands in the interior of British Columbia, Canada, a previously undiscovered, strongly flowing artesian aquifer was encountered at approximately 61 m below ground surface. The encounter resulted in a blowout that compromised the two overlying aquitards, referred to as the Upper and Lower Aquitards, and was followed by several attempts to plug or contain the uncontrolled flow of approximately 38 L/s. These attempts resulted in the final well configuration of the coldstream ranch well (CRW): a nominal 16-inch casing with a telescopic screen at a depth of about 52.7 m surrounded by a nominal 30-inch open-ended casing pile driven to a depth of 44.5 m. The low-strength Upper Aquitard overlain by the upper (surficial) Unconfined Aquifer was washed out during the initial blowout and the installation of the 30-inch casing, which resulted in a large surface crater and consequent loss of materials and drilling equipment. The connection to the flowing Lower Aquifer is inferred to have been by a large “breach” in the competent Lower Aquitard, infilled with winnowed sand and gravel from the Lower Aquifer. In 2013, a large diameter, high-flow relief well was installed adjacent to the CRW to assist in lowering the piezometric surface of the Lower Aquifer as part of a new decommissioning attempt. Due to the potentially high aquifer pressures relative to the depth of the relief well, it was designed and constructed using three telescoping casings, grouted in place using oilfield methods. Following relief well installation and prior to plugging of the CRW, the near surface soils surrounding the CRW required improvement and stabilization to develop an adequate seal around the 30-inch surface casing that was to remain in place. Compaction grouting was conducted in two concentric, offset ring patterns to consolidate and stabilize the Upper Aquitard and Unconfined Aquifer. To plug the CRW and stop the associated flow, the 16-inch casing and screen were pulled and the permeable sediment filling the Lower Aquitard breach was drilled out. Thereafter, the hole was sealed by injecting low mobility grout from the Lower Aquifer up through the Lower Aquitard, across part of the Middle Aquifer, and into the base of the 30-inch casing. The final step of decommissioning the CRW was perforation of the 30-inch casing and backfilling the casing and its annulus with a flowable grout to fill any voids between the casing and the formation. This paper describes the techniques used to install the relief well, including telescoping casing, as well as the various grouting methods used to successfully plug the CRW, resulting in a final shut-in pressure of 340 kPa at the RW3 wellhead.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGrouting 2017Same topicGrouting, Rheology, and Soil MechanicsFrench-language works237,207