A ciência, a estética, a poética e a arte | The science, the aesthetics, the poetry and the art
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A imagem da capa, trabalho do fotógrafo canadense Redd Angelo, tem algo de releitura dos registros de Henri Cartier Bresson. Um intertexto com o personagem que na praça molhada depois da chuva, tem ao fundo um casal apaixonado e seu beijo, protegidos por seu mundo criado a dois sob um guarda-chuva. A fotografia ainda rememora outro salto, o de um homem sobre o espelho d’água. Toda edição da nossa revista é um salto. Na imagem da capa o modelo salta sobre uma superfície, uma lâmina líquida, e seu movimento capturado por uma câmera e toda a cena, inclusive o fotógrafo, também capturada por outra câmera. Nossa capa é metalinguística, assim como a nossa revista. Se a imagem fala, explica a si mesma, nossa revista é comunicação delineando comunicação. Diálogo dentro de outro diálogo. Sonho dentro do sonho. Mídia que revela a mídia. Uma tradução perfeita do olhar atento da ciência (a fotografia é física, química, mecânica – e agora também digital!), no entanto, só se compreende a vida por meio da estética, da poética e da arte.The cover image, a Canadian photographer Redd Angelo’s work, can be seen as an interpretation of Henri Cartier Bresson’s registers. An intertext with the main character that is in a wet square after the rain and who has in his background a loving couple and their kiss, protected by an own world created by themselves under an umbrella. The picture still recalls another jump, the one that of a man on a water mirror. Every edition of our journal is a jump. In our cover image the model jumps on a surface, a liquid blade, whose movement is captured by a camera and the whole scene, including the photographer, is also capture by another camera. Our cover is metalinguistic, such as our journal is. If the image speaks and explains itself, our journal is communication delineating communication. A dialogue inside another dialogue. A dream inside a dream. Media revealing media. A perfect translation of science’s attentive eyes (the photograph is physics, chemistry, mechanics – and now it is also digital!), nevertheless, life can be only understood through aesthetics, poetry and art.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.032 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.030 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".