MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2733441798 · doi:10.5380/2238-0701.0n0p5-7

A ciência, a estética, a poética e a arte | The science, the aesthetics, the poetry and the art

2017· article· pt· W2733441798 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAção Midiática – Estudos em Comunicação Sociedade e Cultura · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation Science and Libraries
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtPoetryHumanitiesArt historyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A imagem da capa, trabalho do fotógrafo canadense Redd Angelo, tem algo de releitura dos registros de Henri Cartier Bresson. Um intertexto com o personagem que na praça molhada depois da chuva, tem ao fundo um casal apaixonado e seu beijo, protegidos por seu mundo criado a dois sob um guarda-chuva. A fotografia ainda rememora outro salto, o de um homem sobre o espelho d’água. Toda edição da nossa revista é um salto. Na imagem da capa o modelo salta sobre uma superfície, uma lâmina líquida, e seu movimento capturado por uma câmera e toda a cena, inclusive o fotógrafo, também capturada por outra câmera. Nossa capa é metalinguística, assim como a nossa revista. Se a imagem fala, explica a si mesma, nossa revista é comunicação delineando comunicação. Diálogo dentro de outro diálogo. Sonho dentro do sonho. Mídia que revela a mídia. Uma tradução perfeita do olhar atento da ciência (a fotografia é física, química, mecânica – e agora também digital!), no entanto, só se compreende a vida por meio da estética, da poética e da arte.The cover image, a Canadian photographer Redd Angelo’s work, can be seen as an interpretation of Henri Cartier Bresson’s registers. An intertext with the main character that is in a wet square after the rain and who has in his background a loving couple and their kiss, protected by an own world created by themselves under an umbrella. The picture still recalls another jump, the one that of a man on a water mirror. Every edition of our journal is a jump. In our cover image the model jumps on a surface, a liquid blade, whose movement is captured by a camera and the whole scene, including the photographer, is also capture by another camera. Our cover is metalinguistic, such as our journal is. If the image speaks and explains itself, our journal is communication delineating communication. A dialogue inside another dialogue. A dream inside a dream. Media revealing media. A perfect translation of science’s attentive eyes (the photograph is physics, chemistry, mechanics – and now it is also digital!), nevertheless, life can be only understood through aesthetics, poetry and art.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Open science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0310.035
Scholarly communication0.0260.004
Open science0.0220.008
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it