Bibliographic record
Abstract
Throughout history, the arts have helped shape society's understanding of self. The end of each of the World Wars created a cauldron for changing - or shaping -identities. As we are on the brink of losing the last of the World War I generation, we are faced again with a period of changing identities. We are moving from a period of living to archival history. How will we remember the past? Although Canada continues to be part of the Dominion and fought alongside England during both World Wars, these two countries experienced war very differently. For Canada, World War I was about proving itself as a new country and shaping national identity. For England, it was about demonstrating its power and performing its imperialist identity. These different voices-the colonial voice of Canada and the Imperialist voice of England - are clearly evident in the theatre written about how these two countries experienced World War I. This paper focuses on one play from Canada - Vern Thiessen's Vimy - in order to demonstrate how theatre can illustrate national identity and can serve as a collective memory for World War I.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.026 | 0.034 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.013 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".