MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2734927163 · doi:10.1194/jlr.d077990

Compound-specific isotope analysis resolves the dietary origin of docosahexaenoic acid in the mouse brain

2017· article· en· W2734927163 on OpenAlexafffund
R. J. Scott Lacombe, Vanessa Giuliano, Stefanie M. Colombo, Michael T. Arts, Richard P. Bazinet

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lipid Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFatty Acid Research and Health
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchDairy Farmers of CanadaMead Johnson Nutrition
KeywordsDocosahexaenoic acidPolyunsaturated fatty acidChemistryIsotope analysisFood scienceBiochemistryGas chromatography–mass spectrometryIsotopeFatty acidMass spectrometryChromatographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DHA (22:6n-3) is the major n-3 PUFA within the brain, comprising over 10% of total brain FAs (1, 2). The incorporation of DHA into brain phospholipids serves to regulate the function and structural organization of neuronal membranes, as well as acting as a reservoir of substrate for the production of bioactive docosanoids and DHA-derived docosahexaenoyl ethanolamide (3). Several studies have demonstrated DHA and its enzymatically derived mediators to regulate neurogenesis, cell survival, synaptic function, and the resolution of neural inflammation (3-5). Despite the apparent critical role of DHA in these processes, the brain relies on an external supply of DHA, which can be sustained by either the provision of preformed DHA or through hepatic synthesis from -linolenic acid (ALA; 18:3n-3); however, there is still much debate surrounding the ability of ALA to solely sustain optimal tissue levels of DHA ( As such, the study of DHA metabolism within the brain and other tissues is an area of ongoing research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.523
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.173
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lipid ResearchSame topicFatty Acid Research and HealthFrench-language works237,207