Bibliographic record
Abstract
As part of an ongoing study of the electronic interactions between solute and solvent molecules, a method for X-ray excited optical luminescence (XEOL) analysis of aqueous solutions was developed at the double-crystal monochromator beamline (DCM) of the Canadian Synchrotron Radiation Facility (CSRF). It was tested using a series of solutions containing lanthanide ions. The samples were contained in a sample holder for liquids with a 3 μm Mylar window separating them from the vacuum (≤3 × 10 −6 torr, 1 torr = 133.3224 Pa) in the solid state absorption chamber of the DCM beamline. Terbium, samarium, and dysprosium have 4 intense and narrow luminescence peaks between 450 and 700 nm, well separated from the luminescence peak of the Mylar window between 300 and 425 nm. The intensity of the rare earth (RE 3+ ) luminescence peaks was lower for the solutions than for solid RECl 3 ·6H 2 O. In part, this was caused by the lower RE 3+ concentration in the solutions than in the solid. In addition, the solvent (water) acts as a quencher. The disorder and the molecular motion in the solution increase the availability of nonradiative de-excitation pathways. A high concentration of SO 4 2− in the solution enhanced the luminescence intensity, probably by inhibiting some nonradiative de-excitation pathways. This study has shown that it is in principle possible to investigate the luminescence of aqueous solutions with XEOL spectroscopy. Furthermore, it is possible to use this technique as a quantitative analytical tool for concentrated luminescent solutions and to study the shielding effects of anions in the solution that increase the luminescence intensity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".