MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2735316420

Incurable Invisible: Living with Advanced Disease in a Canadian Cancer Hospital

2016· dissertation· en· W2735316420 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Alyson Irene Stone

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchDivision of Graduate EducationUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsMedicineGerontology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis follows the lives of people who are diagnosed with a cancer that is unlikely to be cured. This means that even if patients receive one or multiple rounds of the standard treatments of chemotherapy, surgery and radiation, there is a high probability that they will still die from their disease. Incurable illness presents a particular problem due to a combination of cultural meanings and values, both within biomedicine and within society. Drawing on 17 months of ethnographic fieldwork conducted in one Canadian cancer hospital, working with patients with lung and gynaecological cancers, the dissertation answers the question: What is life like for patients with advanced cancer as they live with their disease, post-diagnosis? Although its focus is primarily on the patients, it also includes the experiences of doctors and nurses at the hospital, and patients’ family and friends.\nI explore some of the challenges and tensions produced from living with a diagnosis of advanced cancer. For example, patients are advised to ‘live in the moment,’ but this is a very challenging directive to follow as it is interlaced with the connotation that they are being entreated to do so because their futures are uncertain. Similarly, patients have to muster enough hope to be able to endure the emotionally and physically demanding treatments, but not so much hope that they believe that the treatments will actually cure them of their disease. These entreaties require them to straddle both the worlds of oncology and survivorship and the worlds of death, dying and palliative care, which my findings indicate is extremely difficult to withstand on a day-to-day basis. I argue that advanced cancer is a kind of ‘liminal’ space, an ambiguous territory that exists between the hope for a cure and the imminence of death. Patients’ ambiguous position is made even more challenging since contemporary cancer culture in North America tends to highlight only cancer survivors or people who have ‘lost their battles’ from cancer, rendering the struggles and experiences of patients who are living with advanced cancer but not currently dying from it, both culturally silent and invisible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace (University of Toronto)Same topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207